When it comes to personal injury settlement proceeds, the U.S. federal and state income tax treatment can significantly affect how much of your recovery you keep. Whether you’re a personal injury plaintiff, attorney, or tax advisor, thoughtful structuring and characterization of a settlement is essential.
Here’s a high-level summary of how federal, Ohio, and Kentucky income tax law treats personal injury settlement proceeds, and how to structure a settlement agreement for tax efficiency.
đź’ˇPersonal Injury Settlements Can Be Tax-Free
Under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) § 104(a)(2), certain damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness are not taxable. So, these proceeds aren’t included in federal gross income under IRC § 61, which otherwise broadly includes “all income from whatever source derived.”
To support tax-free payments, especially for Kentucky or Ohio taxpayers, attention to the relevant legal framework and aligning structuring and documentation of the settlement are critical.
🔍 The Federal Income Tax Framework: IRC and Treasury Regulations
Under federal income tax law:
- IRC § 61 is the starting point, which states that gross income includes all income of a taxpayer unless a specific exclusion applies.
- IRC § 104(a)(2) excludes from gross income damages received (other than punitive damages) on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.
- Treas. Reg. § 1.104-1(a), (c) confirms that the exclusion applies to both lump-sum and periodic payments and clarifies the scope of injuries that qualify.
- For instance, it is also possible to exclude settlement amounts attributable to emotional distress, but that emotional distress 🧠must be directly related to the personal physical injury sustained, unless the amount is for reimbursement of actual medical expenses related to the emotional distress and such amount wasn’t previously deducted under IRC § 213.
- 💠Note: Punitive damages and damages unrelated to physical injury—like reputational harm or contract claims—are taxable.
🏛️ State Income Tax Law: Ohio and Kentucky Generally Follow Federal Law
- Ohio Revised Code § 5747.01(A) and Kentucky Revised Statutes §§ 141.010 and 141.019 state that both Ohio and Kentucky generally conform to the federal definition of gross income, with certain state-specific adjustments.
- So, if your settlement proceeds are excluded under IRC § 104(a)(2), they are also excluded from Ohio and Kentucky state income tax, unless a specific modification exists (which does not in Ohio or Kentucky income tax law).
📝 How to Structure the Settlement Agreement
The tax characterization of a settlement isn’t solely based on what the payment is called—it depends on what the payment is actually for. Still, clear language in the agreement helps support favorable tax treatment.
Recommended provisions to include:
- Purpose – Clearly state that the agreement is a settlement instead of pursuing a potential or existing claim or legal action under statutory or common law involving personal physical injuries or physical sickness.
- Characterize Settlement Proceeds into Appropriate Buckets – Â
State amounts of any payments attributable to personal physical injuries or sickness and affirm that the parties intend those payments to be excluded from gross income under IRC § 104(a)(2) and Treas. Reg. § 1.104-1(a), (c). Specifically allocate any settlement proceeds to other buckets if relevant, like punitive damages which are taxable.
⚖️ Final Word
Not every settlement dollar is tax-free. But with smart planning and a well-structured agreement, plaintiffs in Kentucky and Ohio can often shield personal injury settlements from both federal and state income taxes.
Tax advice should always be tailored to the specific facts of the case—so if you’re drafting a settlement agreement or receiving a payout, consult with a tax attorney who knows how to structure these arrangements properly.